Cate Blanchett Is Dressed for Seduction as Carol

carolThere are some films where the fashion feels like a full-on character in it’s own right. Sex and The City, Great Gatsby, Atonement, they’re some of the biggies which all have fashion in them creating this other pull, this other thing which holds your gaze and stands up as a major part of the viewing experience. Carol, the new film directed by Todd Haynes, starring Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara is a film set to join those ranks. A subtle but enthralling love story -based on the book ‘The Price of Salt’ by Patricia Highsmith- Carol, is set in New York city in 1952 and follows the sincere romance between two women. The costumes, designed by Sandy Powell, are EXSQUISTE! Blanchett as Carol is pretty much effervescent, with her high glamour, elegance and sophistication, compared to the more discreetly and casually dressed Therese, played by Mara. Carol is the impeccable type of woman you would see in a magazine while Therese is the working class girl on the street. This styling plays a huge part in Carol’s seduction of Therese, her look, her poise and presence are an aspiration, she is transfixing, and that, well, it’s massively down to her fashion. With her simple elongated silhouette, the smooth tones and perfectly placed accessories, the costume here screams of neatness and constraint, much like the character herself; poised and possibly a little suppressed. To get the look as perfect as it is designer Powell used a lot of era specific underwear to exaggerate Blanchett’s shape; padding on the hips and the classic 50’s pointed bras! With authentic vintage bags and shoes made by Ferragamo to be exact copies of old shoes, the clothing here is just as alluring as the women and the story. Absolutely sublime.

Carol-3carol-movie-poster-cate-blanchett-rooney-mara-5Carol is in UK theatres from 27th November 2015

 

I Dare You To Pick One Decade

100

 

If you haven’t seen this super cute video yet then, firstly; ‘duh? Where ya been Gurl?’ and secondly, let me be the one to show it to you, it’s totally fun! A short, sharp, shot of fashion history in a two minute vid, kinda like playing dress up dolls without any actual effort. Ace. This sweet treat shows the key look of each decade from the 1920’s to the now and although the looks are kinda cliche, the people at mode.com have got it pretty spot on in showcasing the most coveted trends from each era. So many looks to love, the question is, which decade’s look would you go for if you could only choose one? If you like, HAD to choose one era and stick to it for evermore? Ummm, I’ll take the 30’s. And a bit of the 70’s. And some of the 80’s. And a bit of the 20’s. And some 50’s. And a touch of 60’s. Eeesh. #toomuchtolove

 

Audrey Bored-rey?

aud00

Now, I LOVE a good photography exhibition. If it’s about fashion and iconic women, I’m there, standing as a wide eyed pedestrian, my gaze fixed on glossy captures of beauty. And, when I say beauty, I mean life, in all it’s glamour, gristle, realism and fantasy, it’s all beautiful and photography shows us that better than anything. When I saw that there was an exhibition of unseen Audrey Hepburn photos at The National Portrait Gallery, I figured I’d pop it on my list. The website said to book ahead as demand will be high and so, even though it’s not something I usually bother doing, in an attempt to be organised and to force punctuality upon myself I dutifully booked myself a 1pm slot on a Tuesday for £10. Most galleries suggest pre-booking as it creates the idea that it’s gonna be popular but I never guess it really means it, but, when I arrived a little early on the day, goodness, it was busy! It was in it’s first week, and there was another big free exhibition going on but ooof, it was heaving and they were crazy strict with time slots, all the slots up until 5pm that day had already sold out, so in this instance I was pretty pleased with my pre-planning. When the clock hit 1pm I went straight into the exhibition and it was as busy in there as it was the rest of the gallery, so busy you could hardly get to see the photos, jeepers! I couldn’t believe just how many people wanted to get their peepers on the portraits. Obviously Audrey is lovely and very pretty to look at but, crikey, what made this so special? Well, I still don’t know. The pictures were nice, many were very small and there wasn’t any which I felt were anything new, it all kinda felt like I’d seen it before. I assumed that it would get more magnificent as I went round, it was all very beautiful and a sweet insight into Audrey, but, I have to admit, I was a little under-awed. And then, it came to an end, after 3 very small rooms! A nice selection of images of a great icon, but, meh, I was left wanting more. I like Audrey, she’s not one of my most favourite girls, but I appreciate her and enjoy watching her, but these images all seemed a little stale. Maybe because I go to so many fashion photography exhibitions, my eyes have gotten used to bigger things, I like my photos in galleries to be huge, so big you feel small in comparison, so big you can see every eyelash and every pore of the skin, so you feel you’re getting something that you wouldn’t get if you just flicked through the accompanying book. I like to see a character in the images, a change from one image to the next, I guess maybe the simplicity of Audrey and her image alone is the beauty of this exhibition. I know these are portraits rather than fashion photographs, I just think I hoped for more fashion and variety in them. And they were all so small! I didn’t love this exhibition, but I did like it. I just felt it was a little over-hyped. The cynic in me thinks that maybe the estate of Audrey Hepburn needed a boost as many of the images were on loan from the family, and I see that there’s a new Audrey Hepburn cookbook hittin’ the book stores by her son with all her favorite recipes. Totally fair play, if Audrey Hepburn had been my Mama, I sure would be shouting about it all the damn time.

These shots were the ones that stood out to me;

  1. Audrey Hepburn by Philippe Halsman for LIFE Magazine, 1954 (above)
  2. Audrey as Ondine by Philippe Halsman, 1954
  3. Wait Until Dark by Howell Conant, 1967
  4. Audrey for Vanity Fair by Steven Meisel, 1991

aud1aud22flipin

 

Audrey Hepburn: Portraits of An Icon is at The National Portrait Gallery until 18th October 2015

Dressed to Dance; Memphis The Musical

mem1

I was pretty certain that I’m not the kinda girl to enjoy a Musical at the Theatre. I had assessed, years ago, that they were probably a little too saccharin and happy-clappy for me to sit through. Not that I don’t like a trip to the Theatre, I absolutely do, I adore a night watching a play or a movie on the big screen, the escapism enthralls me but, singing and dancing….meh, not for me. But on Tuesday night I totally proved myself wrong. Coming out into the blustery streets of London from a too-busy tube journey- the kind where strangers are all a little to close for comfort- my Mum and I arrived at Shaftesbury Theatre, expecting a somewhat mediocre show. ‘Probably a painfully cheery display of over eager performers’ we thought, but, we were shown something way superior. From the very first second that ‘Memphis The Musical’ sprang into action, we were hooked, big time. What an invigorating show we were given! Produced by Christopher Jahnke and starring Beverley Knight and Killian Donnelly, this multi award winning and energetic show told a totally readable tale about the birth of black music into mainstream America in the 1950’s. I, of course was mostly taking a keen peep at the clothing, especially as the 50’s is one of my favourite fashion eras, and, I wasn’t disappointed with that either. Esteemed Costume Director Paul Tazewell has created a total feast for the eyes. Often in theatre, you see more reproduction vintage as it’s easier, more dance and sweat proof, the originals sometimes being too fragile and scarce to be used night after night sustaining so much wear and tear. But, having a pretty good eye for what’s the real deal in old clothes, I could see from my seat that much of the fashion was -hooray- original, and I was all the more excited because of it. Lead Beverley, whose voice literally took my breath away, wore some super cute dresses, and a couple of gorgeous pencil skirts and knits too. All very typical of the American fashions at the time, the kind of 50’s clothes that most gals drool over, the epitome of the era. She wore one red chiffon cocktail dress which particularly made my eyes pop and the added sparkle to many of her dresses meant she shimmered and dazzled under the lights like a doll. The dancers all gave great costume too, each one in perfectly authentic wares from the time, some in Capri pants and tight knits and others in their full skirted glory; perfect for their exaggerated moves. It wasn’t cartoonish like say, Grease, it was more honest, more mature and a great display of what real people in Memphis would have afforded. The guys were pretty snazzy too, quite often, and probably quite rightly, men’s fashions are overlooked and dull in comparison to women’s, that’s true for all eras; ladies fashion is just more exciting as a rule. But here, we had gold lurex suits, checked gabardine jackets, Cuban shirts and trilby’s, totally brilliant. And boy did they wear them well! Those gals and guys can dance and sing, jeepers, a standing ovation was the obvious ending to the night! You could say that this fantastic musical makes a very slightly lighthearted story of an important racial movement in history, it doesn’t get too deep or harrowing even though we know the reality was harsh. But it does give a brief glimpse into the situation of racial inequality in 50’s America, whetting your appetite to learn more, and giving you exactly what you want from a night at the theatre: entertainment and a smile on your face as you leave. I’m converted, I loved it, I Thought it was nothing short of excellent and simply cannot fault it one bit. And the vintage fashion made it not only brilliant, but very beautiful too.
mem4memphis-musical-thefabuloustimesMemphis, 2014, Credit: Johan Persson/mem3mem2

Memphis The Musical is at Shaftesbury Theatre now

Get a glimpse of the show here

 

Getting to Know Knitwear

knit 10

Ooof! If there’s one thing I love about the colder weather that’s creeping in, it’s getting all cosy with knitwear and so it was without hesitation that as Autumn started showing it’s blustery face I swooped down to the beautiful Bermondsey to take in the latest exhibition at The Fashion and Textile Museum; called KNITWEAR, Chanel to Westwood. I’ve not been to an exhibition at this place which I haven’t adored, it’s the most informal, welcoming and relaxed atmosphere and the size of the exhibition space means that each show is perfectly digestible and you don’t need to spend hours making sure you’ve seen everything there is to see. Although that being said, I get the feeling that staff wouldn’t mind one bit if you fancied lingering the whole day long looking at the fashion on display. Sometimes with the more epic fashion exhibitions at venues such as the V & A, it can be kinda overwhelming and you feel like you need to invest the bulk of your day taking in all the sights and remembering all the information you are learning. Sometimes, that’s great, you wanna loose yourself in a magical exhibition, in an amazing venue for hours and hours, but, there’s a lot to be said for those small and perfectly formed exhibitions in smaller places which can be enjoyed as part of your day rather than as all of it. For me, this is where The Fashion and Textile Museum excel.
This exhibition was a super display of knitted fashions spanning the last century and, was interestingly predominantly made up of the personal collection of Mark and Cleo Butterfield. It was more a showing off of their vast and spectacular collection than a timeline of knitting, allowing the whole thing to feel slightly more light-heated than historically rigid. With amaaaazing examples on show, we get to see the journey of knitwear; it’s early use for warmth and function, knitted swimwear and evening dresses of the 1920’s, the ‘make do and mend’ trend for unravelling jumpers to use the yarn again, embellished angora sweaters from the 50’s, futuristic knits from the likes of Couregges in the 60’s, novelty and folklore knits in the 70’s and the experimental bold knitwear from the 80’s! This exhibition is thorough without being too heavy and you get a really good grasp of knitwear and it’s past, there’s plenty to swoon over, especially, for me, the 1920’s fine knit gowns! The layout was a bit dark for me, the displays were sectioned into large wooden shipping crates, with some piled two high so it pulled the small space in quite close and felt a bit gloomy, but, the actual garments themselves were all pretty well lit and what I always like about this place is you can peep your eyes up real close to the displays and see every stitch! A gorgeous exhibition that leaves me gasping to get a look at more of Cleo and Marks incredibly large private collection of vintage fashion….. making mine just seem teeny in comparison.

collageknitwit1collageknitwit2

 KNITWEAR, Chanel to Westwood is on at the FTM until 18th January 2015

To find out more about Cleo and Mark Butterfield visit their blog